LOGIN / Acesse o sistema

Esqueceu sua senha? Redefina aqui.

Ainda não possui uma conta? Cadastre-se aqui!

REDEFINIR SENHA

Insira o endereço de email associado à sua conta que enviaremos um link de redefinição de senha para você.

Ainda não possui uma conta? Cadastre-se aqui!

Este conteúdo é exclusivo para membros ABCM

Inscreva-se e faça parte da comunidade

CADASTRE-SE

Tem uma conta?

Torne-se um membros ABCM

Veja algumas vantagens em se manter como nosso Associado:

Acesso regular ao JBSMSE
Boletim de notícias ABCM
Acesso livre aos Anais de Eventos
Possibilidade de concorrer às Bolsas de Iniciação Científica da ABCM.
Descontos nos eventos promovidos pela ABCM e pelas entidades com as quais mmantém acordo de cooperação.
Estudantes de gradução serão isentos no primeiro ano de afiliação.
10% de desconto para o Associado que pagar anuidade anntes de completar os 12 meses da última anuidade paga.
Desconto na compra dos livros da ABCM, entre eles: "Engenharia de Dutos" e "Escoamento Multifásico".
CADASTRE-SE SEGUIR PARA O VIDEO >

Tem uma conta?

Eventos Anais de eventos

Anais de eventos

COBEM 2023

27th International Congress of Mechanical Engineering

Is hybrid additive manufacturing the best option comparing cost, quality, productivity and flexibility? A case study using Bia Area Additive Manufacturing (BAAM) and Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) for a bearing manufacturing.

Submission Author: Alex Camilli Bottene , SP
Co-Authors: JESIEL ROCHA, Damião Fiuza, Alex Camilli Bottene, Givanildo Santos
Presenter: Alex Camilli Bottene

doi://10.26678/ABCM.COBEM2023.COB2023-1886

 

Abstract

Hybrid additive manufacturing aims to combine the flexibility of additive processes with the high productivity and quality of material removal processes. However, when combining these three decision factors with the final cost of the part, how does the decision-making process change? In this study, two additive manufacturing processes were chosen as case studies for producing a standard part: fused filament fabrication (FFF) and big area additive manufacturing (BAAM). These parts were manufactured using four different combinations of these processes, with or without machining in the same setup. The conditions were: FFF process, machining (milling and drilling),hybrid additive manufacturing with BAAM and machining and additive manufacturing with FFF and machining. The results were evaluated by comparing manufacturing time, cost, material volume, dimensional tolerances, surface roughness, and flexibility (setup time). Under the evaluated conditions, hybrid additive manufacturing with BAAM presented the best results balancing all proposed criteria, with the lowest cost and material volume consumption, while maintaining similar dimensional and surface quality compared to the other processes. FFF represents the most flexible additive manufacturing process, with the shortest setup time for preparation. Machining had the shortest manufacturing time, due to its high removal rates in the evaluated case. It is expected that these results and discussions will support the composition of other cases for a balanced evaluation of the performance of hybrid additive manufacturing processes.

Keywords

Big Area Additive Manufacturing (BAAM), Hybrid Additive Manufacturing, Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), Manufacturing Performance Indicator

 

DOWNLOAD PDF

 

‹ voltar para anais de eventos ABCM